Thomas, > list (for example see http://kitt3n.homeftp.net/?p=11).
Unfortunately the approach from the link is rather superficial. It does not handle following: 1. pools per size 2. how does it free memory on delete. To do that you need keep information about size as any delete/free knows only the adress. 3. does not handle threading at all. If you are interested in the topic, and more serious approaches/solutions look at loki library (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki_(C%2B%2B), Intel's thread building blocks, libhoard, googles memory allocator. However the approach I suggested was particular for wt. Please read again my email to understand the real goal. mobiphil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
