Hi, Koen.
Thanks for your attention first.
> 2010/3/9 <[email protected]>:
>>> You'll have to manage yourself a list of WApplications/... that need
>>> to be updated on a server push, for example by using a global
>>> variable that contains a list of applications. Applications can put
>>> themselves in the list in the application constructor, and remove them
>>> from the list in the destructor (but the appropriate way to do this
>>> really depends on your application).
>>
>> I did it like what you say, but there's a big problem: cause, the
global
>> variable is a list, all keepalive application instances are stored in
it,
>> but I cann't delete any elements in it, I did it in the destructor. The
>> destructor never called, because there's server push data to the
>> application instance, which does not care about the browser is closed
or
>> not, the keepalive timer is changed to default again. I'm very distress
>> about this problem.
> Not really. When you do a server push to an application which closed
> the browser, this will eventually timeout.
> The simplechat example works exactly this way.
I havn't seen any structure that stored the WApplication::instance in
Simplechat,
It uses the Signal/Slot mechanism, not global variable, Am I right? Or the
Signal/Slot mechanism is a way to store the WApplication::instance?
---
B.R.
Jiongliang
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
