On 10-07-28 3:24 PM, Koen Deforche wrote: > Hey Sohail, > > 2010/7/28 Sohail Somani<[email protected]>: >> > On 10-07-28 3:42 AM, Koen Deforche wrote: >>> >> IMO, Wt::Dbo should not automatically delete the dependent objects. >>> >> >> > >> > FWIW, I disagree with this. Cascading deletes are important to the >> > integrity of the data. > But forcing integrity is a job for the database, and it seems that Wt > should not actively try to repeat the work of the database -- what do > you have against the database 'on delete' clause ?
Oh, I think we are saying the same thing then. What I was unclear on was what happens to existing Dbo::ptrs when you delete though I guess they would behave like Boost's weak_ptr. Sorry for the confusion :D ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
