On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Sohail Somani <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10-08-09 10:55 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, OvermindDL1<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>> >  On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Koen Deforche<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> >>  Hey Volker,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>  2010/8/9 Volker<[email protected]>:
>>>> >>  ( see also my recent blog post about c++0x lambda's and Wt :
>>>> >>  http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt#/blog/2010/08/06/wt_and_c__0x/  )
>>> >
>>> >  I really do not like C++0x lambda's, they are restricted and
>>> >  monomorphic and so forth.  Look at this example from your blog post:
>> Hey, I read the article in the comment of that above blog post and
>> noticed it spoke of the monomorphic restriction of C++0x lambdas as
>> well, which phoenix handles perfectly as mentioned earlier.:)
>
> If you are referring to the link about C++0x lambda and Boost Bind, I
> wrote the comment and the article.
>
> C++0x lambdas are mostly useless to me if they are monomorphic. I feel
> that very strongly and I brought it up as a concern to a committee
> member. Want to guess why they are monomorphic?
>
> Come on..
>
> Try..
>
> Got it?
>
> No?
>
> Ok, I'll tell you...
>
> It's because..
>
> Of..
>
> Concepts!
>
> Yep, the feature which may never make it in handicapped quite possibly
> one of the biggest features in the new C++ language.
>
> Argh.

Hence why you should look at Boost.Phoenix[0], it is purely
polymorphic, easily mutatable based on the incoming type passed in
when called, can even call templated functions, members, whatever.

[0] Boost.Phoenix2 docs at
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/libs/spirit/phoenix/doc/html/index.html
Boost.Phoenix3 coming soon, same interface though.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to