When using wt trunk, as of today, and boost trunk of today, building causes
an error when building wt's random_device.  Should I be using trunks to
build wt?

[46%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/wt.dir/web/random_device.o

/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp:45: error: 'const unsigned int
boost::random::random_device::min_value' is not a static member of 'class
boost::random::random_device'
/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp:45: error: uninitialized const
'boost::random::random_device::min_value'
/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp:46: error: 'const unsigned int
boost::random::random_device::max_value' is not a static member of 'class
boost::random::random_device'
/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp:46: error: uninitialized const
'boost::random::random_device::max_value'
/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp:51: error: 'const char* const
boost::random::random_device::default_token' is not a static member of
'class boost::random::random_device'
/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp: In constructor
'boost::random::random_device::random_device(const std::string&)':
/var/local/wt/src/web/random_device.cpp:162: error: 'max_value' was not
declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/wt.dir/web/random_device.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/wt.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes
not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as
part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers.
Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision.
Read this report now!  http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to