On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Wim Dumon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Gaetano,
>
> In such cases, I tend to use a shared_pointer to manage the lifetime
> of the WtTerminal object. As such, the DTOR would be called after the
> queued posts have disappeared.

Can the boost::bind get a shared_ptr instead of a plain pointer? Never
tried to be honest.

> I'll let Koen comment on the proposed modification to post(). Similar
> to shared_pointer, if you pass an object with a special destructor
> that tells WtTerminal when it's destroyed, you could get WtTerminal to
> count how many of your messages are still unhandled in the post()
> queue. But that's a bit more clumsy for the user, I guess.

It is indeed.

What would be usefull to know is the following:

After the WApplication::finalize is called, can I consider all the
post for that given session
going to be not called ?

Regards
Gaetano

-- 
cpp-today.blogspot.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest

Reply via email to