Dear Koen, would you be so kind send an example haproxy configuration, how do you use it with wthttp?
Thanks, Gabor On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 16:11 +0200, Koen Deforche wrote: > Hey Alec, > > 2011/8/20 Alec Taylor <[email protected]>: > > Does using FastCGI have disadvantages, in speed, reliability & > > capability (graceful downgrade)? > > FastCGI has some advantages: > - more deployment options (e.g. dedicated process) > - peace-of-mind of using a standard web server > > ... and disadvantages: > - lower performance because most web servers are not asynchronous and > thus thread-hungry > - no support for web sockets (ever possible) > - not as easy to configure > - not easy to restart a single application > > Using wthttpd in combination with HAproxy is my preferred deployment > combination. > > Regards, > koen > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model > configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and > the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free > download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > witty-interest mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
