On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Jason H <scorp...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Qt QUICK is essentially WPF in Qt. Qt ... I was at a Windows Phone 7.5 > development > > workshop a couple of months ago. Many in the audience were designers > and had developed with Qt QUICK. When they saw that pile of XAML... > they hated it. > > ----me--- > I was going to say, please don't insult QtQuick like that. I've doen WPF and > it is completely asinine.
Huh? Maybe I didn't express it too well, but that's exactly what I said: people love QtQuick because it is very clean. People hate WPF (including its little brother Silverlight) because XAML looks awful. Also, the CSS-like syntax of QML makes it easier to parse and manage from automated design tools a-la Expression Blend: it's just snippets an automated tool can add and remove. Same for the XML-based XAML. On the other hand, dealing with JavaScript-compliant code like Koen's sample looks more difficult (but maybe it's just me, I have never written a JavaScript parser). -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
