Hey,
Awesome ;-)
> Changing the direction will affect on all child widgets in case I called
> it for application instance?
>
Yes. There aren't that many users that use Right-to-Left, and browsers have
some quirks as well, so there may be smaller issues with it. Let us know.
> How much is the difficult in case I used QtCreator as IDE for Wt (I'm Linux
> developer)?
>
> If you write .pro file for qmake, then you can treat it as Qt project.
> I have not try this.
>
> I looked for this feature and I discoved that using qmake isn't easy as
> you expect because Wt depends on boost which is using cmake so
> -theoretically- I've run boost in qmake to be able to run Wt in qmake too
> which is very very complicated procedure... is it?
>
Once built, boost is just a library like any other library, which you
should be able to use easily from any build system though.
Is there any translation tool for parsing generated xml translation file
> just like QtLinguist (*.ts files are xml files too)?
>
No, there isn't. The format is easy enough though that you can convert from
one XML format to another using an XLST, I guess.
>
> 1. As I know Wt API inspired from Qt why Wt doesn't join to
> qt-project.org or at least collaborate with them?
>
> I'm not sure what to collaborate on, though. Wt and Qt are entirely
distinct code bases and there is no plan to start sharing things. Obviously
there is a group of developers that use both Wt and Qt, but this is
actually a minority in the Wt community.
>
> 1. Is there any plan to create GUI designer OR at least modify
> existing GUI designer (I found Qt designer quite well)?
>
> This is an ever-returning discussion. See past discussions in the mailing
list archive. Personally I have nothing against it, but on the other hand,
I'm not sure it will work well to simply adapt the concept of the Qt
Designer to Wt. Wt doesn't have a 'moc' meta object compiler which comes in
hand to provide the designer introspection in the widgets.
>
> 1. Why Wt doesn't use LGPL or BSD like most open source toolkits?
>
> Because of the difference in nature between a web application (which isn't
necessarily distributed to the end user) and a desktop application, we find
the GPL well applicable to Wt (and our business).
Regards,
koen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
