---------------------------------------- Thomas Suckow <thomas.suckow@...> writes:
> > > Is this correct or is there a better approach to this? > Nope. > Yep.http://www.webtoolkit.eu/wt/doc/reference/html/classWt_1_1WStackedWidget.html > "This is a container widget which at all times has only one item > visible." > I would try just using a WContainerWidget instead of a > WStackedWidget. > - > Thomas > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, I see, that's much simpler. I did Wt::WContainerWidget *wContainerWidget = new Wt::WContainerWidget(root()); Wt::WText *text1 = new Wt::WText("Should be overlaid"); Wt::WText *text2 = new Wt::WText("OVERLAY"); text1->setPositionScheme (Wt::Absolute); text2->setPositionScheme (Wt::Absolute); wContainerWidget->addWidget (text1); wContainerWidget->addWidget (text2); and it works fine. Many thanks Nigel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ witty-interest mailing list witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
