But you also say "if someone really wants to do it". Which is it? Let's say
someone came up with something, submitted the merge and it was good clean
code.... would it get merged or would it get shunned? Is it Meh or is it No
Soup For You?
I'll give an example. The interop in the GAC problem. Your comment was "meh,
don't put *our* stuff in the GAC". I kept quiet but I thought that was a silly
opinion. If you don't want it in the GAC, don't strong name it. What do you
care if it's in the GAC? The Private tag is the correct technical decision
but for some reason you find it unimportant and uninteresting hence "meh".
Well, from my perspective we solved a technicial problem by putting it in the
GAC and we are using it for really cool stuff other then just writing custom
actions. To me it belongs not only in the GAC but it belongs in the .NET BCL
as the missing MSI interop assembly. It's a kick ass library... the best of
it's kind in the world IMO.
----------------------------------------
In mFrom: "Rob Mensching" <r...@robmensching.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 7:13 PM
To: "WiX toolset developer mailing list" <wix-devs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [WiX-devs] Resolution "meh"
"NoScope" doesn't quite feel like saying "we're not really interested in this
bug/feature." "OutOfScope" (which admittedly is even more words <smile/>) might
be closer. but it misses the lack of interest part. "Deferred" sounds a lot
like we're considering it for future, which isn't true. And yes, sometimes
extreme "meh" sounds like "srsly" but it's the same in the end: a technically
correct feature we're not really interested in. <smile/> I'm not coming up
with better words myself yet so keep 'em coming. it seems like it's out there.
From: Christopher Painter [mailto:chr...@iswix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:23 PM
To: WiX toolset developer mailing list; WiX toolset developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [WiX-devs] Resolution "meh" Deferred is what we used at my last
job.
In the meetings that I attended, sometimes I heard "meh" really was as you
describe but other times it was said with a tone of "you got to be kidding
me... whatever".
----------------------------------------
From: "John Cooper" <jocoo...@jackhenry.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:08 PM
To: "WiX toolset developer mailing list" <wix-devs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [WiX-devs] Resolution "meh" It's not strictly one word, but
"NoScope" is pretty plain. -- John Merryweather Cooper Build & Install
Engineer -- ESA Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.® Shawnee Mission, KS 66227
Office: 913-341-3434 x791011 jocoo...@jackhenry.com www.jackhenry.com
From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:30 PM
To: Windows Installer XML toolset developer mailing list
Subject: [WiX-devs] Resolution "meh" I was supposed to send this out last
week and forgot. At our last status meeting we discussed a new resolution for
issues that are technically correct but we're not interested in actively
tracking (usually because we don't care for the feature. but if someone
*really* wanted to do it.). The word "meh" captures the concept but it isn't
exactly the friendliest way to communicate what we wanted. So, does anybody
have better ideas for a resolution? Keep it short. The ideal is one word (heh).
Suggestions? Note: I also liked the concept of "-0" (aka: minus zero) but
isn't immediately clear what was intended.
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message,
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or
distribution
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
Android apps secure.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
WiX-devs mailing list
WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
