On 02-Feb-14 23:35, Sean wrote:
My problem with trying to make sure that variable values are encrypted during runtime and zeroed out when freed is that I'm not sure the encryption can be done in 3.x.
My assumption was that it would be transparent, decrypted when requested from the BA or referenced in manifest authoring. Do you see a problem where it wouldn't be?

So I guess what it comes down to is whether to have SecureStringVariables even if the engine won't be encrypting what it receives. The alternative would be creating yet another *Variables (StringPointerVariables?) so that the managed BA doesn't have to use a System.String.
My concern is that the presence of the property implies something that won't be true until/unless it's backed by the engine.

--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
WiX-devs mailing list
WiX-devs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs

Reply via email to