Derek Cicerone wrote: >That's an idea, but then we'd be blocking off guids that people can never >use. That's a good idea though. Perhaps we could just interpret the >"PUT-GUID-HERE" values as a null guid or something when a special hidden >candle option is specified. > > Aren't Guids supposed to be globally unique though, and so they couldn't be generated again.
>Another idea might be to have a special process that runs over unit test >files before they are sent to the compiler to fill in guids. > > > This might be a better way, as the unit test authors wouldn't need to remember to use the special guids. They would still need reminding to not put an actual guid in the test xml in case someone copies it - perhaps have a test to check if they do have guids in and fail if they do. Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ WiX-users mailing list WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
