Thanks for your reply,

The self-updating bundle seems interesting and I will look more into that.

I understand you advise against swapping out the MSIs on the server. The
problem with adding patches as you describe is that we already have our own
software that updates the applications we install (it's one of the packages
we install, actually). After installation is finished we have a step in our
bootstrapper that communicates with this software service to download the
latest patches (not only MSPs).

Ideally we would not want to update anything (so this updating step should
be /very /short). Since we're already downloading the packages, we want them
to be the latest. Also, our application is non-trivial in size and scope,
which means *a lot* of packages - and a lot of updates and bug fixes. Having
to edit the bundle, add the MSPs and updated MSIs and increment the version
and rebuild each time we have a new package will take time, time we ideally
want to save.

It should be noted we don't want to add /new /MSIs. At that point it would
seem fair to update the bundle, rebuild and distribute. However, for all the
minor versions it just seem like such a hassle. Is there really no way for
us to work this way? :)

Cheers,
Amadeus



--
View this message in context: 
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Burn-Updating-package-without-rebuilding-tp7582033p7582060.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users

Reply via email to