On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:23:34 +0200 Lubos Lunak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
(B
(B> On Monday 11 of April 2005 05:36, Rob Adams wrote:
(B> > There haven't been any changes to the current draft spec in a long time,
(B> > and everyone is implementing the draft spec instead of the released spec.
(B> >
(B> > How's about putting together a timeline to get it in shape to release?
(B> > Or maybe just declaring it done? What still needs to be done? Are
(B> > there major warts we should shave off before releasing?
(B>
(B> I'm not aware of anything to be done (except for the don't-raise-on-DND
(B> functionality for which nobody(?) has an implementation for the latest
(B> proposal, well at least I still don't *sigh*, so unless somebody else does
(B> this one doesn't seem to make it in). I think we can just stamp it
(B> "Official".
(B
(Bspeaking of proposals... i should come out of lurk mode...
(Bthe virtual desktop specs are a little inadequate. basically for e17 you can
(Bhave more than 1 virtual desktop visible at once (internally the implementation
(Bis done using "zones" a zone being a region of the screen (much like xinerama)
(Bthat displays one of N virtual desktops (in a NxM gird) attached to that zone).
(Bthe spec assumes display of 1 desktop at a time globally on 1 root. that kind
(Bof doesn't ... err... work as there are 2 or 3 or 4 or N active desktops in e17
(B(so for now i simply have to ignore ewmh for this)
(B
(Bthe question is - do you want to stamp a release or continue adding things like
(Bthis. i personally don't mind one way or another as this kind of thing becomes
(Bhard to support for pagers etc. and likely just wont be supported, but imho its
(Bthe much better HID paradigm for things like multihead xinerama where each head
(Bhas its own virtual desktop. (so far the feedback is 100% in favor of this too)
(B
(B--
(B------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B)
(B_______________________________________________
(Bwm-spec-list mailing list
([email protected]
(Bhttp://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
