> Well, you may be right, I don't know. The smarter guys like Lubos and > Rob will have to comment here about the intention of > DEMANDS_ATTENTION.
Well I don't want to claim I'm smarter than Elijah (especially since, as the one who wrote most of the code, his expertise in this matter now exceeds my own), but the basic reason for DEMANDS_ATTENTION was that the semantics were actually somewhat different than Urgent, plus its allowed to be set by the WM, and perhaps more importantly , which is required for this use of it. The lack of Urgent support in GNOME is really more of an oversight and we really should get around to supporting it. Honestly it should probably just be a if (DEMANDS_ATTENTION or Urgent) then do something attention-grabbing but not focus-grabbing. The relevent bug is here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120439 I think at this point we can probably move the part of the discussion involving the GNOME implemention to the comments on that bug, since we're way offtopic now. -Rob _______________________________________________ wm-spec-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
