On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:01:05 +0200 Bradley T Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Indeed. This is something that comes up quite often in our bug reports
> and support requests. People want to do this, and our answer always has
> to be "On X11, the window manager may ignore the borderless hint." I
> don't think it's necessary to be able to control individual decorations
> like you could using _MOTIF_WM_HINTS, but the possibility of turning off
> all decorations is sorely needed. I, for one, would also like to see
> more policy spelled out for the various window types, but I'll leave
> that discussion for another day.
i'd vote mwm hints are seen as explicit if present, and if not the type is a
hint and the wm may do whatever it wants.
btw - whats up with qt's icccm take_focus handling? if you send a take_focus
client message (as per icccm) WITHOUT first setting the focus on the window - qt
doesnt honor the request and take the focus (even though it advertises that it
does take focus protocol). the icccm doesnt say the window must have been
focused first :) have i monumentally misunderstood the icccm or is there some
deeper meaning behind doing this?
ie this works:
ecore_x_window_focus(bd->client.win);
ecore_x_icccm_take_focus_send(bd->client.win,
ecore_x_current_time_get());
this does not:
ecore_x_icccm_take_focus_send(bd->client.win,
ecore_x_current_time_get());
gtk advertises take focus proto and it does work with this. is it possible you
guys have a bug? :)
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
_______________________________________________
wm-spec-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
