Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > Isn't the Mercurial repo supposed to be bug-fix only? From those 32 features > you mention, it can be a hard thing to judge whether new bugs will be > found after some time, right?
There may be bugs in the bugfixes. The mercurial repo is not bugfix-only, nor was it ever intended to be. There are currently five branches: default 1613:5a2507602c48 wm_0_92 1600:a522b1c3bd64 dan 1576:b723317f453c wm2 1404:6295b2452427 wm 1:57fa3b61b720 "wm", "wm2", and "dan" are inherited from CVS. "wm_0_92" is the 0.92.x branch. "default" is the develoment / head branch. > If I remember correctly the initial idea from Dan was that you would collect > bug fixes and the result would be released as the long awaited wmaker-1.0. > And after that people could go wild. There are some features that will be added prior to a 1.0.0 release, but only a subset of the 32 I have currently identified. I do expect to see another 0.9x release prior to 1.0.0. Current plan: 0.92.1: bugfix and documentation update 0.9x.0: code standardization and additional features 1.0.0: a featureful, bugfree release -- John H. Robinson, IV [email protected] http (((( WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, sbih.org ( )(:[ as apparently my cats have learned how to type. spiders.html (((( -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
