On Wed 17.Mar'10 at 15:14:12 +0100, Tamas TEVESZ wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > I think we could make all those match*() functions into a generic > > one inside the WINGs library. I wanted to do the minimal fix now, > > but will be happy to see this unified someday. Would you agree > > with that? > > i am not sure what you mean by making them into a generic one. if you > mean what i think you mean, then that would really just be an > indirection layer, and specific matches would still need to be present > (because there are different specific data types and members of 'em to > be matched).
Yeah, you are right of course! -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
