On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > whatever you see fit, though i'm not sure this doesn't count as > > "falsifying history" :)) > > But #next is not supposed to have a history (it is supposed to > be rebased). The purpose of #next is to try to avoid that mistakes > or omissions propagate to the "stable" branch #master. > > Of course, that is only avoidable in a reasonable amount of time (~10 days > at most), like in this case. But if I notice that some patch can > be cleaner before it hits #master, I think it is worth to fix it up.
do that, then. i don't care, really. i know squat about git, or how to do proper workflow with it. whatever you see fit ;) -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
