On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 at 10:23:11 +0100, Iain Patterson wrote: > Quoth Alexey I. Froloff, > > >Since bouncing respects DisableAnimations option, there's no need > >in #ifdef's. > > I haven't tried any of this bouncing stuff yet so apologies if I'm > missing something obvious but is there a provision for people who > want animations but don't want bouncing?
With this patch applied the answer is 'no'. But at least for me it makes sense to keep 'bouncing' under the 'animations' option, as bouncing something is a prime example of an "animation", no? -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
