On 2010-09-28 Tamas TEVESZ <[email protected]> wrote:

> these were probably supposed to be some sort of (rich) text editor 
> components, both of which are quite unlikely to be used ever again.

> wdm doesn't use them either, so so long.


enum {
-    WC_Window = 0,
-    WC_Frame = 1,
-    WC_Label = 2,
-    WC_Button = 3,
-    WC_TextField = 4,
-    WC_Scroller        = 5,
-    WC_ScrollView = 6,
-    WC_List = 7,
-    WC_Browser = 8,
-    WC_PopUpButton = 9,
-    WC_ColorWell = 10,
-    WC_Slider = 11,
-    WC_Matrix = 12,                   /* not ready */
-    WC_SplitView = 13,
-    WC_TabView = 14,
-    WC_ProgressIndicator = 15,
-    WC_MenuView = 16,
-    WC_Ruler = 17,
-    WC_Text = 18,
-    WC_Box = 19
+    WC_Window,
+    WC_Frame,
+    WC_Label,
+    WC_Button,
+    WC_TextField,
+    WC_Scroller,
+    WC_ScrollView,
+    WC_List,
+    WC_Browser,
+    WC_PopUpButton,
+    WC_ColorWell,
+    WC_Slider,
+    WC_SplitView,
+    WC_TabView,
+    WC_ProgressIndicator,
+    WC_MenuView,
+    WC_Text,
+    WC_Box
 };


I think this removal of WC_Matrix might break binary compatibility,
i.e. binaries built against the older header will fail to run
correctly, since 13 is suddenly WC_TabView instead of WC_SplitView. (I
am assuming that enum is working as a #define would. But that is me
guessing.)
cu andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'


-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].

Reply via email to