On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > Ops, indeed. But what do you think about the solution below? > As superflous.h is using "dock" and "screen" stuff, it should better > include their headers, no?
at this stage i think it's better not to. superfluous.h is included elsewhere too, which may or may not need dock.h and screen.h, which situation might need some deeper investigation. -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
