On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 at 8:35:29 +0200, Gilbert wrote: > > Someone mentioned in their reply to this thread that they use wmaker without > any dock or clip -which is exactly what I do. But having the DockApps patched > to properly identify themselves makes it possible to still use them and have > them show and properly behave.
I am curious. What is the advantadge of disabling dock when one still wants to use dockapps? I see only the issue of having to patch every single dockapp out there. You've done that already, so there must be a strong reason :-) > I am very much in favor of seeing any DockApp sources which are still > available > patched up and mirrored somewhere -I think apart from the wmaker sources is > best. So it looks like the majority disagrees with having them inside wmaker sources. I volunteered to carry some dockapps inside a folder in wmaker-crm to have the "most important ones" close together with wmaker itself. It would help beginner users for issues like: "I don't get a systemtray with wmaker, nor a easy way to mount things. And the apps I care about expect a systemtray and I don't want to fiddle with /etc/fstab everytime I install a new distro. So I simply use KDE and be done with it." That was my point. I've seen the "it would be cool to have dockapps together somewhere" without understanding what is wrong with dockapps.org. Broken links to original homepages? So what? -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
