On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > > > > > [ma...@pilar:wmaker.git]$ git grep NewStyle > > > > ... > > > > WindowMaker/Defaults/WindowMaker.in: NewStyle = YES; > > > > WindowMaker/Themes/OpenStep.style: NewStyle = YES; > > > > debian/WindowMaker.default: NewStyle = YES; > > > > > > > > I suppose OpenStep.style and debian/WindowMaker.default should > > > > be changed too? > > > > > > could as well. > > > > I changed them to "old" (as I am not sure the original intent was > > to use 'new' unless they predicted the future). > > it should rather be "new". that's what the newstyle=yes translates to.
Ok, changed to 'new' and rebased. I also rebased 'next' a few commits down too. In the patch to remove the asm code I also deleted the Makefile.am lines with AM_CFLAGS= That caused a 'make install' as root to recompile some stuff. It's restored now. I may clone the wmaker-crm repo to check out how much trouble rebasing 'next' gives to people. I assume that staying at 'master' and doing a 'git pull' does not cause trouble, but so far nobody confirmed that. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
