On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 at 23:39:22 +0200, Tamas TEVESZ wrote: > > brad:), and converting the current wmgenmenu to a "parser" should also > > not be a problem (hello, carlos!:) > > here's an idea, carlos. what if the wmgenmenu stuff wasn't added as a > new parser per se, but we converted its contents to this wmconfig > format, shipped that with wmaker, and used that to generate a menu > wmgenmenu does now?
Well, why don't we leave wmgenmenu untouched for now? I am still not familiar with your new menu generator (do we have a sample configuration to test with? I have no idea what I should use as input to wmmenugen). If I understand correctly, the new wmmenugen creates a menu based on some file with menu entries, while wmgenmenu tries to find which applications are in your PATH and creates a menu based on that. So those are two different approaches for the menu, right? We can have both, I guess. Or perhaps I simply did not understand what you mean by "we converted its contents to this wmconfig format"... -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
