I don't like frames too. On 02/02/12 22:13, Paul Harris wrote:
> My review: > > I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the > actual build of the website. > > It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't > click the News button, and then bookmark the site, because the URL > doesn't change at the top), > > The frame sizing is all wrong on my Windows Chrome (buttons clipped etc), > > And if the window is shorter than the required height for the buttons > frame, no scrollbar appears for scrolling down the buttons-frame. > > > I tested the website on my little phone-browser, and each time I click a > button, the content moves further to the right. > > > So, I like the approach, but please switched to a frameless design. > And, someone is going to have to put content up regularly (ie new News) > > > On 3 February 2012 02:12, John H. Robinson, IV <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I think we[1] can all agree that the Mojomojo experiment is a dismal > failure. With that in mind, I'd like to present a simpler, more NeXTish > website. > > Carlos took some time to write up a rather simple interface that shows > off some of the best clean features and navigations of Window Maker. > > http://beta.windowmaker.org/ > > Feel free to take a look around, and comment. If this is good, a git > repo will be set up and we can have at. > > -- > John H. Robinson, IV [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http > (((( > WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above, > sbih.org <http://sbih.org> ( )(:[ > as apparently my cats have learned how to type. > spiders.html (((( > > > [1] I speak only for myself, and those that like what I say. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > > -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
