On Thu, 01 Nov 2012, BALATON Zoltan escribió: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 at 12:04:35 +0100, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: > >>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012, BALATON Zoltan escribió: > >>>According to the relevant standard this is what's intended: > >>>http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/1.3/ar01s05.html > >> > >>Patch is attached. Thanks for your replies. > > > >According to the spec that Zoltan pointed out, there is also > >_NET_WM_VISIBLE_ICON_NAME, which says: > > > >If the Window Manager displays an icon name other than > >_NET_WM_ICON_NAME the Window Manager MUST set this to the title > >displayed in UTF-8 encoding. > > > >Your patch falls in the category of using an "icon name other than > >_NET_WM_ICON_NAME", so I think it must also set _NET_WM_VISIBLE_ICON_NAME, > >no? > > Also I'm not sure it's correct according to the spec to use > _NET_WM_NAME instead of _NET_WM_ICON_NAME (although it does not > prohibit that). What it says in my understanding is that it should > fall back to use WM_ICON_NAME if _NET_WM_ICON_NAME is not set. Is > this the case currently? WM_NAME and WM_ICON_NAME on the other hand > seem to have no relationship. If WM_ICON_NAME is also unset it may > use some default like the application class that seems to be the > default in Motif and maybe Xt but I found no precedence of using > WM_NAME instead which is meant to be the window title. So your patch > may be incorrect. What application does have this problem. Could > this be a bug on that application's side instead?
gitk, but the application has title. > Regards, > BALATON Zoltan -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
