On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 at 13:54:42 +0200, Paul Seelig wrote: > On 08/29/2013 11:32 AM, Iain Patterson wrote: > > Quoth I, > > > >> This patch allows wmaker to replace existing window managers with the > >> --replace flag, like xfwm4 and metacity can. It also allows those > >> window managers (or another wmaker) to replace wmaker in the same way. > > > From a user's point of view, i think this is a very worthwhile feature.
When was the last time you wanted to --replace a window manager? In my case, I _never_ did this. I don't see the point, sorry. > And while we are at it, there are some more feature enhancements which > would be very worthwhile to be added, but which strangely enough nobody > ever seems to have bothered about yet: I agree with your other feature enhancements and ideas, but let's not mix things up here. Let me be clear: The fact that I don't want to include the code about --replace does not mean I won't include other things. But a line must be drawn everytime a decision is made. I don't think that "other window managers do" is a reason to include code doing exoteric stuff and used once or twice in a lifetime (I guess). -- To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
