From: Christophe CURIS <[email protected]> ----- Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]> a �crit : > On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 at 13:22:49 +0200, Christophe wrote: > > From: Christophe CURIS <[email protected]> > > > > [...] > > > > -#define WCHECK_STATE(state) (state == WProgramState) > > +#define WCHECK_STATE(chk_state) (w_global.program.state == (chk_state)) > > Unfortunately this patch doesn't compile because you define w_global > only in the next patch. > > Does it make sense if I rebase your series and put patch 2 after patch 3? > I haven't seen the rest yet, but I guess I can do that.
Unfortunately, that won't work either, as in current state both patchs can't be taken separately, even if order does not matter. They used to be a single patch, that I split before sending because I thought it would be better. If you want to keep each commit not breaking compilation, you can either re-merge the 2 patches together (my initial setup), or use the fixed patches coming next. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
