On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Carlos R. Mafra escribió: > On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 at 0:55:26 +0000, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > > I noticed a few things while looking at the default WMWindowAttributes. > > > > * Many of the icons don't ship with Window Maker (e.g., ColorGNU.xpm for > > Emacs), but instead are in the WindowMaker-extra tarball. (Similarly, > > the Debian default WMWindowAttributes, which has mostly different icons, > > references icons in the wmaker-data package, which is only suggested but > > not required by the main wmaker package.) > > > > * Many of the icons are for rarely used software in a modern system > > (e.g., Netscape). > > > > * The current version of Window Maker does a mostly great job of getting > > icons from applications, and so declaring icons in WMWindowAttributes > > seems unnecessary outside of things like the dock, clip, and drawers > > (unless the user wants an icon theme). > > > > At this point, leaving things the way they are seems to only be of > > interest for historic purposes. I'd like to make some changes, but I > > wanted to see how people felt about the issue before I started submitted > > patches. > > I think it's a good idea to sanitize this. > > There is more than one way to proceed, eg include the missing icons > or remove their appearance in the config files, remove/keep the Netscape > icon (I'd favor removing it) etc. > > But my first reaction is "go for it".
+1 Changes are welcome. -- ||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia ||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
