----- Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 at 20:52:27 +0100, Christophe wrote: > > From: Christophe CURIS <[email protected]> > > > > Hello, > > > > Following the reported by Amadeusz, I had a deeper look, so I am proposing > > new version for the 4 patches: > > - patch 1 replaces 45a976b5d47e7968dfee8768c1bf4373015b8593 > > - patch 2 replaces 77c34804f9742a898728f8a389f209b5c5747e8c > > - patch 3 replaces add823ef6a9efdd6e4192d21a69c7bda6c6c5e69 > > - patch 4 replaces ad98a1a338f5e64c8d978b8958f1fe2556f6e0da > > > > Basically, the core problem was using LDFLAGS, when the proper variable > > to use is LIBS (still wondering how I missed it...). > > > > I also took the liberty to merge Amadeusz typo fix so the history will > > remain simple, while we're still on #next. > > > > Carlos, > > If this resubmission happens to be too annoying work for you, let me know > > if there's a way to make your work easier. > > Thanks. > > I did some surgery in the #next branch, please double check that this > is what you expected.
Hi, Sorry for the late answer... Everything looks fine from my side, thanks for the hack! -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
