----- Carlos R. Mafra <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Sat,  1 Mar 2014 at 19:13:43 +0100, Christophe wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > This serie of patchs is implementing the changes that I have proposed
> > > to David's patch:
> > > 
> > >  - patch 1 / for review: contains the changes against the patch, for
> > > easier review;
> 
> For some reason this patch did not arrive at the mailing list together with
> the others.

That's probably because I messed up the title, it arrived as:
  [PATCH] WUtil: Renamed 'syslog_shutdown' to have an API consistent name

instead of [PATCH 1/3 for review] WUtil: Renamed...


> > >  - patch 1 / merged: proposes the same changes merged into the original
> > > patch, to replace the commit 320430efe5642db07c82d75a6e6311065233d622 to
> > > keep a simpler history (again, will be handy at changelog writing time);
> > 
> > 
> > Commit id was meant to be: 4a17aa58626ba27d56fe5a5cbdff3b415c2464b3
> 
> This is very kind of you, to propose your fixes to be merged into his
> patch.
> 
> I was hoping that David would address your review comments in a new
> version of his patch, but now we don't need to wait any longer :-)

>From a little discussion with him, he seems to be more in favor of a 
>patch-over-a-patch (or maybe he's not yet an expert of git's amend/rebase 
>stuff)


> > >  - patch 2: fixes a small thing seen while making the patch
> > > 
> > >  - patch 3: more fixes I missed during first review. Could be amended to
> > > patch 1 without regret
> 
> Thanks a lot Christophe! I'm sure all wmaker users appreciate your
> contributions.

Thanks, I hope so!


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].

Reply via email to