On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:51:04PM +0100, Georg Neis wrote: > * Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:29:55PM +0000, Uriel wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > > > Michael Prokop has created one for grml already based on > > > > 9base-1-rc1. He choosed /usr/share/9/ as location. > > > > > > are you people on drugs? > > > > No, but the Debian guys having problems with /opt or /usr/lib or > > /usr/local. > > Any Debian developer will tell you that /usr/share certainly was the > wrong choice.
The correct directory would be /usr/plan9/ or /usr/9/ - but this won't be accepted until 9base is not that widespread as X11R6. /usr/lib is maybe a better choice referring what the GNU guys write in hier(7), but still a bad place. From BSD POV I don't see the point in messing up /usr/lib with binaries, but well, I've seen such things in Debian. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
