On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:02:45AM -0800, Anthony Martin wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] once said: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:05:11AM -0800, Anthony Martin wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] once said: > > > > I might be wrong, but shouldn't the test on line 604 of cmd/wm/fs.c be > > > > inverted? As it stands right now, the page is removed but we're still > > > > given the "permission denied" error. Maybe I'm missing something. > > > > > > Hmm. I was wrong about the test being inverted. After looking at the > > > code for destroy_page(), I realized that it shouldn't return p if > > > everything went smoothly. > > > > > > However, I'm still not sure why it was giving me the "permission denied" > > > error even after removing the page. > > > > In the meantime I changed that crappy signature to something > > more useful. > > Works correctly now. Thanks :) > > I was wondering if you planned on implementing the page remove feature > as a shortcut (i.e. $MODKEY-Control-r,y) or an action like in wmii-2.5. > Right now I have it set up in my wmiirc as a shortcut but I > wanted to know your view on the matter.
Yes, this shortcut will follow soon. > Oh, one more thing .. should I be posting these to the mailinglist > instead of emailing them directly to you? [email protected], I cc'ed your mail. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
