On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:18:53PM +0100, Uriel wrote: > Please, stop talking about things you have no clue; no one ever said > wmii should depend on all p9p, so stop spreading FUD. Thank you. [...] > (Of course this is all based on misinformation spread by garbeam and > his selective memory.)
Clarification: I said, that a merge-in of 9base to p9p, what I'm still planning todo, would consist of ~60kSLOC at least. And it is fairly unsure, if the stuff can be separated easily with some mkfile's and stay in sync with the master tree, because yaccpar*, unsharp() of lib9, and rcmain at least are expected in a specific place, other glitches might be there as well, which makes the plan not too easy. There might be reasons not todo the merge-in and to stick with p9p instead, they apply if the effort to maintain p9p-base would be too expensive and no userbase exists. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
