On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:12:58PM -0800, Anthony Martin wrote: > Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: > > What the hell are you people thinking? This removes the whole dynamic > > concept of cols, and makes it almost impossible to get a larswm-like > > behaviour. > > I agree with Uriel. If the user has to manually create columns, isn't > that completely opposite the dynamic wm concept?
To prevent any confusion. The user has not to create manually columns. He uses wmii like acme, he just creates a page with 2 or 3 columns (or simply 1 column if he uses a browser or whatever). It is pretty much like acme -c <n> > > This makes the whole system much more dynamic as one can create and > > delete windows and one doesn't have to worry about keeping track of > > existing cols and of reclaiming the space of empty cols, and one > > doesn't waste space with the title for the col. > > Exactly. What the system makes dynamic is, that you can easily move clients between columns and that you can on the fly change the layout of a column, how it organizes the space for its clients. Why do we need additional concepts? Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
