On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:39PM +0100, Uriel wrote: > You obviously can't read, the differences between the mechanism I > proposed and awk, it is like comparing a fly with a 747 and claiming > that a fly requires many tons of steel. > > Of course you demonstrate considerable ignorance about awk, as pattern > matching is just a small part of awk, and even then, awk is just a few > thousand lines of code. If you need more than one hundred lines of > code to split a string and match with basic globing operations, you > are certainly delusional.
Define a rule grammar, write a rule matcher which has a char ** or char * as result and provide us the code. If you do it in lesser than 100 lines we can think about your mechanism. Note that you have to parse the rules from a char buffer with proper length. I don't care if you want to keep the information in rule structs after writes to /pattern or in the char buffer. Just do it in lesser than 100 lines to show us, that you're not delusional. Thanks. Otherwise simply shut up. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
