On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 04:15:26PM +0100, Stefan Tibus wrote: > > Hmm...ok, but it's quite unusual and not even consistent. Why can I > > access a file which the listing says does not exist? To be consistent, > > if "1" is named "sel" then "wmiir read /..../1" should fail. But it > > is very useful to be able to access all areas/clients by number, so > > it was kept. But then I think it should also be listed. > > Currently, "sel" can be thought of being a temporary symlink (as > > shorthand) to the selected area/client and I think it should be listed > > as such then. > > "sel" always points to the selected object (its index can be > still accessed but is not displayed if it is selected, because > you can easily determine which index relates to "sel"). Well...that's right, but why should the filesystem hide a file which exists and is accessible? What's the advantage of it? (And I still think this is inconsistent.)
Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
