On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:23:34AM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote: > Hello, > > I have one suggestion on this, which you might like to implement > (or maybe not). > Most of the shortcuts (I think I have only one where this is not > true at the moment) are simply mapped to some program call. So > for me it would be nice to have them in an array together with > the commands, instead of having to edit them in separate places. > With your patch I'd still have to create the shortcut variable, > add it to the wmiir write /def/keys call and to the case statement > as well. Your patch saves on changing existing shortcuts only > (which is still an improvement). > So the idea would be to have an array for the "simple" shortcuts > containing the shortcut and the associated command. Writing these > to /def/keys appears straight forward. The event loop however > would need to check for all shortcuts in the array and then > execute the associated command. I have no idea how to do this in > sh, however. For "advanced" shortcuts the current case construction > should be kept. > What do you think? > > (There would probably be a very "elegant" way to do this in perl, > but I guess nobody would like to depend on that ;-) )
See awk(1) for reference. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
