Hi, On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:22:43AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:41:14 +0200, "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:01:49PM -0700, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: > >> # SHORTCUTS > >> + > >> +# wmii +shortcut_reloadConfig=$MODKEY-Control-w,y > >> +shortcut_quit=$MODKEY-Control-q,y > > > Sorry, this looks much more cumbersome to me. In the old way I see > > exactly what happens if a specific shortcut is reported by /event in > > wmiirc, with this approach wether I trust the variable name or I > > have to recheck... you have much overhead in maintaining this in my > > eyes... > > Hint: SPOT-rule (Single point of truth) > > I know at least three people who looked at the wmiirc and said it is > shit. And -as it is very likely lots of people will look at the > scripts-, we should try to make every effort to keep them clean and > consistent. > > So please consider a way to have keycodes/shurtcuts without having to > define them on two distinct places.
If someone presents a nice idea which works with sh, maybe in conjunction with awk, I'm open to do it. Otherwise blame X that it needs to grab shortcuts and there is no portable way to get keyboard events in any other way. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
