Am 2006-04-11 15:19 +0200 schrieb Anselm R. Garbe: > Maybe. I used 2.5.2 recently and found it less dynamic.
I have no doubt in that. > The reason of your impression might be, that you think in a way > which is dominated by larswm(aka tiled)-layout. Actually I use Yeah, this may be. > That is the reason for swapping, which never destroys columns. hmmm... > >--->---$MODKEY-Control-h) > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/sel/ctl swap prev > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/ctl select next;; > >--->---$MODKEY-Control-l) > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/sel/ctl swap next > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/ctl select prev;; > >--->---$MODKEY-Control-j) > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/sel/ctl swap down > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/ctl select up;; > >--->---$MODKEY-Control-k) > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/sel/ctl swap up > >--->--->---xwrite /view/sel/ctl select down;; All right, as I said, I will take the time this evening to investigate and get used to the new concept. Actually, here at work, I only installed a current snap a couple of days ago and startet learning some bindings other than in 2.5.2. I will also test your suggested bindings to get used to the power of current snaps ;-) Regards, Konsti -- GPG KeyID EF62FCEF Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
