On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:56:44PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:24:01PM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote: > > > Well...I think the question is, why the addition of a tag to a window, > > > which would (in the current view) just involve redrawing the title > > > bar, issues a redraw of the client at all? This may not be a bug, > > > but may be avoided as well... (Maybe a todo for the next release.) > > > > As I told, wmii has no influence to the client, if the client > > decides to redraw itself, wmii can't be the reason if it wether > > changes the clients size or if it draws the frame (parent > > window). > > Hmmm...but something tells that client "this area has been modified > and should be redrawn" (or am I wrong in that assumption?). So the > point is, that the area to be redrawn is not full client frame but > just the title bar, so the enclosed client does not overlap with > the redrawn area and does not need to redraw at all. I think the "bug" > here consists in the claim of the area to be redrawn - it's not the > full parent window of the client, but just an area which does not > overlap with the client. (Or is this partial redraw impossible in X ?)
wmii does partial readraws, it defines so-called notch-areas (simply the client area), which isn't drawed for performance reasons. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
