I loved wmii-2 and was disoriented for a while with wmii-3. Now that I'm used to it I think wmii-3 is superior. Hats off to the devs, very nice wm.
However, I would find it very annoying if wmii was completely overhauled like this with every new release. I hope the devs have enough restraint to follow through with a design direction rather than starting over from scratch every time they have a new idea. Anyway, nice work. Congrats on the release. On 5/21/06, ellotheth rimmwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/21/06, phyrster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any wmii2 to wmii3 users share this feeling? Yes, actually. I miss the old configuration style (patching the source to move the bar to the top of the screen seems a little extreme to me), and the ability to close windows with a middle-click on the titlebar, and the cursor following keyboard focus-changes. (I know, little things.) I could get used to stacking, but as a screen real-estate junkie, I think stacking vs. tabs is something akin to rock vs. hard place. (And do I correctly understand the new layout model that views can't be saved between sessions?) On the other hand, tagging is brilliant. Seriously. Fantastic idea. Major points to wmii for that. I really like the window-managing logic--columns, navigation keys, etc. And as far as stacking goes, it is nice to be able to see the whole title. At any rate, there lieth my two cents. So you're not alone. (Note: No disrespect intended toward the devs. You guys are geniuses, and wmii-3 is a great product. My addictions weren't included, but I'll be fine after a few days in rehab.) -- ellotheth rimmwen * monjoy * _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
