On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:53:50PM +0200, Denis Grelich wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2006 18:16:54 +0200 > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe the wmii-dock also should have "gravity" to ensure it stays > > > at the top or bottom of the column? But what if there are two of > > > them? Also, I > > > > Nah, it will behave like a client, except that it would always > > be visible and that it can't be resized vertically. > > Heh. This is even worse than increment handling. Rather make it > variable-width and -height, like any sane client, and adjust the > rendering of the icons. Hide some, if they are not visible, break the > vertical stuff up into rows if neccessary, display little arrows to > scroll through the dockapps, but please don't make it fixed-width.
Fixed height, but variable width. Fixed height is good, because you are not forced to see these dockapps in any view. No need for scrolling complexity. -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
