On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:36:43AM +0100, Simon Morgan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 02:38:00AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > > It's late here, so let me clarify that I sometimes forget that people on > > mailing lists use anything other than the development head of a given > > program. The wmii releases specify -O2 (although -O3 works perfectly well > > and gives noticable speed improvements) and do not include debuging > > information. The binaries, however, are still not stripped. strip -s > > removes ~15k, or about 10% (Note that a stripped Ion is ~328k, fluxbox is > > ~8.4M). > > wmii-3 does't seem to use -O at all, unless I'm missing something.
Yes that is true. I think -O is no good default. The default of the compiler should be the safest method, otherwise the compiler is broken. If someone needs -O666 he can use this option on his own. (I really doubt that you notice any difference)... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
