On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:40:57AM -0300, Fernando Canizo wrote: > El 09/jun/2006 a las 07:21 -0300, Anselm me decía: > > New (proposal): > > > > [The idea is to remove the column-representation in the fs-hierarchy, > > because this is not used.] > > > /tagrules > > /tag/NAME/0 (floating clients) (*) > > /tag/NAME/1 (column 1) (*) > > /tag/NAME/ctl > > > > > > (*) Each tag contains a file pro area (0 == floating area, 1,... == > > columns), whereas each line looks as follows: > > Since you are considering modifying the fs, please take in > consideration my sugestion for tags having an order property, so we > can have ordered tags without having to put numbers in their names or > relaying on strange names. > > I want my 'dev' tag to come after my 'web' tag no matter what > abecedary says, and without mangling the names like: '3.web' '4.dev' > > /tag/some_name/order > > where order takes an integer from 0 to n > > If user puts same number on two or more tags, then they get > lexicographically ordered. > > Also i like having all the tags in one place, not like wmii-3 stable > release wich has all flying around. I like that 'tag/' dir.
I think having alphabetically ordered tags looks simple to understand and is simple from an implementation point of view. I don't think that it is worth the effort to clutter the tag namespace with order files. If prepending a number looks awkward, what about using 'browse' instead of 'web' that 'dev' appears after 'browse'... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
