You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: ARG> This proposal will make it necessary to write the complete bar ARG> content on every update. I'm not sure I like it. But the idea of ARG> creating labels separated by | doesn't looks to bad.
This means every client wishing to update bar have to parse current bar state, replace part of it with new state and set it back. This makes clients more complex. Not sure whether this makes WM more complex or not. And this scheme has unsolvable (without some kind of bar locking) race condition: c1 reads bar c2 reads bar c1 parses bar state c1 updates bar c2 parses bar state c2 updates bar And we lost the change c1 did. -- JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
