On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:03:47 -0400 Sean Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:45, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: > > 2. Use a _bus_ communication channel, which is separate from the > > usual IXP stuff, for broadcasting events. This way, anyone > > interested in events can simply connect to this bus and get events > > at their leisure, without any data loss (the bus listener would be > > buffered I/O, like a socket, so you do not miss any events). > > Boy, I'll bet that I get tarred and feathered for suggesting this... > but what about dbus? The only significant disadvantage I can see is > the external dependency it would introduce, which is probably enough > to keep it from being an option. You just stole the joke I was going to make ;)
pgpaQENGugK4I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
