On Nov 4, 6:53 pm, Joseph Nebus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 5:56 AM, Doug Elrod wrote:
>
> > So, what's the consensus this year for when the Presidential Election
> > gets decided? How about naming a minute within the next two days, or
> > a day beyond that. Closest to the correct time wins (no penalty for
> > going over, unlike "The Price is Right"). For the sake of
> > definiteness, have the declaration-of-record be from ABCNEWS (of
> > course, this means that if you work there, and are involved in this
> > decision, you really shouldn't be entering ;-)). And, naturally,
> > there's a none-of-the-above option available for "To be decided by the
> > Supreme Court" ;-)
>
> Oh, heck ... I'll go in at 10:38, which is as close to the Dave Barry
>
> joke as I feel safe making. next?
Congratulations, Joseph Nebus! By my reckoning, it happened at 11
p.m. (just as soon as California et al. closed). Enjoy the bragging
rights!
Of course, Kevin Brabant gets the "Concession" award for being the
only person to predict there would *be* one. (It happened at 11:18
p.m., in case that was the time that you *would* have guessed.)
-Doug Elrod ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ;-)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"World News Now Discussion List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wnndl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
